What do you think about Aristotle's motion proof of god?

We know that there is not perpetual motion. We also know that there *is* motion.

(Besides those existentialists)

Postulating my first two statements, there has to be a starting point of some motion. If things had always been moving and always will be moving, there is perpetual motion. Therefore someone (or something) had to give initial motion to the universe and the realm of existence.

I'm not saying this proves any one religion as "right", but does this confirm the existince of an extremely powerful "animating force?"

What do you think about this?What do you think about Aristotle's motion proof of god?It's nonsense, and was debunked centuries ago. See:What do you think about Aristotle's motion proof of god?
I think Aristotle's grasp of science was extremely limited so I really don't put much stock in his proof of the divine thru a poorly understood science.What do you think about Aristotle's motion proof of god?It's called Big Bang.What do you think about Aristotle's motion proof of god?
None of those things are known without a doubt. We have such a limited understanding of the universe and its physics we really aren't in a position to answer that question. It's like writing a review of book after reading the first chapter.What do you think about Aristotle's motion proof of god?Its isnt proof, but the best matmatical evidance of god that we have. The big bang is a load of crap, and should be forgotten.What do you think about Aristotle's motion proof of god?
I think "Angels and Demons," a novel by Dan Brown would answer your question best. It does have suggestive content, but it's worth reading.

flyff

national tire and battery